Qlik Replicate vs DBConvert Streams

Qlik Replicate (formerly Attunity Replicate) is a heterogeneous enterprise CDC platform with a click-to-replicate UI and big-data targets.

DBConvert Streams is a focused self-hosted MySQL ↔ PostgreSQL migration and CDC workflow with a built-in IDE.

Try the focused self-hosted path

Quick answer

Choose by job

Choose Qlik Replicate if

  • The source estate includes Oracle, DB2, SAP HANA/ASE, mainframe, or AS/400.
  • Targets include Kafka, Snowflake, Databricks, Synapse, or BigQuery at enterprise scale.
  • You want a UI-driven enterprise CDC platform without GoldenGate-grade scripting.
  • You already run on the Qlik Data Integration stack (Compose, Enterprise Manager).

Choose DBConvert Streams if

  • The job is MySQL ↔ PostgreSQL migration plus continuous CDC.
  • You want self-hosted control without per-source licensing.
  • You want migration, validation, CDC, IDE, and federated SQL in one product.
  • You want to move real data, compare what landed, monitor the run, then turn on CDC from the same workspace.

At a glance

Side-by-side facts

Aspect
Qlik Replicate
DBConvert Streams
Source engines
Oracle, MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, DB2, SAP HANA/ASE, MongoDB, mainframe, AS/400, others
MySQL, PostgreSQL, files, S3
Target engines
All sources plus Kafka, Snowflake, Databricks, Synapse, BigQuery, Redshift, S3
MySQL, PostgreSQL, files, S3
Initial load (migration)
Yes — full-load with parallelism
Yes — schema-aware, resumable, parallel writes
Continuous CDC
Yes — log-based, agentless on most sources
Yes — log-based binlog/WAL with checkpoints after target ack
Schema/DDL replication
Configurable on most sources
Not automatic — apply target schema changes as part of operational procedure
Validation
Job monitoring and metrics; deeper compare via Qlik Compose or external tooling
Compare views, schema diff, run history built in
Federated / cross-source SQL
No
Query MySQL, PostgreSQL, Parquet, CSV, S3 in one statement
IDE for daily SQL
No
Free IDE tier
Licensing model
Per-source/instance enterprise contract
Free IDE tier; paid migration and CDC runs
Setup
Days to weeks; integration partner common
Minutes to hours; desktop or Docker

Where Qlik Replicate wins

Replicate from an enterprise-heterogeneous estate

Oracle, SQL Server, DB2 (LUW/zOS/iSeries), SAP HANA and ASE, MongoDB, mainframe (IMS, RMS), and AS/400 as sources — a matrix DBConvert does not attempt.

Land changes in big-data sinks

Kafka, Snowflake, Databricks, Synapse, BigQuery, Redshift, and S3 as targets, with schema/DDL replication configurable on most sources.

Operate enterprise CDC without GoldenGate-grade scripting

The click-to-replicate UI is the product's signature — easier to stand up than script-heavy enterprise CDC, with Compose and Enterprise Manager for modeling and fleet ops.

Where DBConvert Streams wins

Skip enterprise procurement entirely

Free IDE tier plus paid migration and CDC runs, no per-source/instance contract, no integration partner. Setup is minutes to hours on desktop or Docker.

Validate with data, not just job metrics

Compare views, row counts, schema diff, and run history ship inside the same workflow — Qlik typically leans on Compose or external tooling for deeper compare.

Keep an IDE and federated SQL in the same product

Daily SQL, ER diagrams, and cross-source queries over MySQL, PostgreSQL, Parquet, CSV, and S3 — capabilities outside Qlik Replicate's scope.

Workflow

Run a MySQL ↔ PostgreSQL migration plus CDC without an enterprise CDC contract

  1. 1Connect source and target and review the schema diff with type mapping.
  2. 2Run the full load with resumable checkpoints and parallel writes.
  3. 3Compare row counts and sample content before cutover.
  4. 4Continue with log-based CDC and watch throughput and lag in Stream Monitor.

Qlik Replicate is the right answer when the estate is enterprise-heterogeneous with big-data sinks. DBConvert Streams is the right answer for focused MySQL ↔ PostgreSQL work under self-hosted control.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Can DBConvert Streams replace Qlik Replicate?

For MySQL ↔ PostgreSQL workflows, yes — and the same product covers migration, validation, and continuous CDC. For Oracle, DB2, SAP HANA/ASE, mainframe, or AS/400 sources, or for big-data sinks (Kafka, Snowflake, Databricks), no — that stays in Qlik Replicate territory.

How does Qlik Replicate compare to Oracle GoldenGate?

They sit in the same heterogeneous-enterprise-CDC market. The common framing: GoldenGate is more powerful and more script-heavy (Extract/Pump/Replicat process model, DBA-grade ops, supports active-active with conflict resolution); Qlik Replicate is more UI-driven and easier to stand up but lacks GoldenGate's deepest active-active features.

Does Qlik Replicate handle migration too, or only CDC?

Both. The "full-load" mode performs the initial migration (with parallelism), then the CDC mode keeps targets aligned via log-based replication. Same shape as DBConvert and most enterprise CDC tools.

How is validation different?

Qlik Replicate provides job monitoring, throughput, lag, and error metrics. Deeper compare-and-validate workflows typically rely on Qlik Compose or external tooling. DBConvert ships compare views, row counts, schema diff, and run history inside the same workflow.

Pricing comparison?

Qlik Replicate is licensed per source/instance under enterprise contract; total cost depends on the source matrix and number of pipelines. DBConvert has a free IDE tier and paid migration and CDC runs without per-source fees. Different procurement brackets — Qlik Replicate sits with enterprise data-integration platforms; DBConvert sits with operator tools.

When does each clearly win?

Qlik Replicate wins when the estate is enterprise-heterogeneous, targets include big-data sinks, and a UI-driven enterprise platform is the requirement. DBConvert wins on focused MySQL ↔ PostgreSQL workflows under self-hosted control, with IDE and federated SQL bundled in.

Ready to try DBConvert Streams?

Try the focused self-hosted path Browse all comparisons